Australian anti-nuclear protest

Adapted from Sydney IndyMedia by Diet Simon 22.11.2007 01:47 Themen: Atom Globalisierung Weltweit Ökologie
"You're voting for whether we're gonna live or die"


"You're voting for whether we're gonna live or die," an Aboriginal woman has told an anti-nuclear rally in Alice Springs, central Australia. With a federal election due on Saturday, one of the most burning issues for people living in the Northern Territory, which contains Alice Springs, is fear that the mainly desert land will become a dump for nuclear waste from all over the world.
The incumbent right-of-centre government of Prime Minister John Howard has announced plans to nuclearise Australia, already the world’s biggest exporter of uranium.
Howard wants a string of 25 nuclear power stations around the east Australian coast and has started buying Aboriginal land for waste dump sites.
Unlike Australian states, the Northern Territory is still under the ultimate control of the national government, which has just stripped 73 Aboriginal communities there of practically all of their rights, allegedly to stamp out sexual abuse of children.
Critics see it as a land grab to facilitate mining and nuclear dumping.
Polls predict that the Howard government will lose the election to be replaced by Labor. But Howard has had an uncanny knack for turning things in his favour up to a few hours before people vote.
Labor says it opposes nuclear power but has just agreed to limitless uranium mining and exporting if the states where it happens want this.
In Alice Springs Mitch, an Eastern Arrernte/Luritja woman, spoke out strongly against a nuclear waste dump on her land. "It's not good enough for white people but good enough for black people," she said. "We're getting a bit sick of that."
Mitch encouraged voters to think carefully about the nuclear waste dump on Saturday, because of its impact on Indigenous people. "You're voting for whether we're gonna live or die," she said.
Protesters confronted the government candidate for the seat of Lingiari, Adam Giles, outside his Alice Springs office.
About thirty demonstrators challenged him to oppose the proposed nuclear waste dump.
Protesters read a statement "to tell the story of how the federal government is forcing its radioactive waste onto unwilling communities in the Northern Territory”.
Using oversized speech bubbles, they decorated the front wall of the Country Liberal Party (CLP) office with some of the statements made by Liberal party members about the proposed nuclear waste dump.
These included local CLP Senate representative, Nigel Scullion's promise to "cross the floor" and oppose the dump, a promise on which he reneged.
"Senator Nigel Scullion, whose office we are visiting today, said 'there's not going to be a nuclear waste dump in the Northern Territory. The people of the Northern Territory don't want anybody else's nuclear waste... I represent them and so, not on my watch,'" the statement quoted.
He later supported the dump legislation in parliament.
The statement highlighted a lack of government consultation with Indigenous communities in accepting the nomination of Muckaty Station for a dump.
The traditional Ngapa landowners of the former cattle station have offered land about 120km north of Tennant Creek for a radioactive materials repository in exchange for 12 million Australian dollars (7 million euros) from the government. The site is being assessed before a decision is made next year.
"Julie Bishop...[minister for science] said she was confident all affected people had been given adequate opportunity to express their views. She had obviously disregarded the numerous letters and public statements of opposition from members of all 5 family groups in the Muckaty Land Trust," the protesters’ statement said. For more on the lack of consultation see  http://www.abc.net.au/alicesprings/stories/s1692156.htm.
The group added that neither of the major parties could be trusted to stop the proposed dump, though "the Greens, Democrats and Australian Labor Party all oppose the current plan forcing the dump on the Northern Territory".
In the 1950s and 1960s Britain exploded atom bombs in central Australia without warning Aborigines living there. Many died from radiation illnesses, others are still ill and trying to get compensation. For more on this see  http://www.google.com.au/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGIG_enAU222AU223&q=atom+bomb+tests+Australia.


Protests across Australia

Protests similar to that in The Alice occurred simultaneously across Australia in a national day of action opposing the waste dump.
In the southern city of Melbourne protestors locked to a one-tonne barrel of “nuclear waste” for 35 hours, barricading the entrance to the [Howard’s] Liberal Party Headquarters to highlight the federal government’s dangerous plans to impose a nuclear waste dump on Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory.
The vigil was part of a National Day of Action expressing concern about the Coalition’s continued refusal to disclose its nuclear agenda to the Australian community ahead of the federal election, and received significant public support over the two day period.
“The Coalition government has failed to consult or convince the community over its plan for radioactive waste,” said Friends of the Earth (FoE) anti-nuclear campaigner, Michaela Stubbs.
“Before the last election the Coalition promised the Northern Territory that nuclear waste would not be headed their way. They broke that promise, and now they are pushing ahead with an ‘out of sight – out of mind’ plan for a nuclear waste dump in the NT.
“They promised Australia that we would not become an international dumping ground for nuclear waste but have now signed us up to the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership that would see Australia selling uranium across the globe and taking back the waste at the end of the toxic nuclear chain.”
The controversial radioactive waste dump plan is facing growing opposition in the NT and along the proposed transport routes. The process followed by the government in selecting sites for the national waste dump is unpopular and undemocratic. There has been no community consultation, and resistance and protest continues to be ignored by the Coalition government.
Despite Julie Bishop’s suggestion that proposed dump sites are ‘some distance from any form of civilisation’ (ABC Radio 30/01/2007), people, and in particular Aboriginal communities, are located as close as four kilometres from the sites.
None of these sites were short listed by a scientific study aimed at identifying a site for a national repository.
One of the sites is located in an earthquake area – extremely dangerous when waste will be stored under ground, as is the Territory’s water supply.
“There is no agreed or credible long term solution for the management of radioactive waste”, said Claire McCall, from the Australian Student Environment Network (ASEN).
“The Coalition’s plan is a secretive and dangerous nuclear experiment that poses a long term risk to people and the environment.”
Police took two hours to cut the activists from the “nuclear waste” barrel, and the two people cut free were charged with obstructing a footpath and the entrance to the building.
On the dangers of nuclear dumping in Australia see  http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/08/13/2003015.htm .
On American pressure to nuclearise Australia see  http://abc-classics.com/news/stories/2007/07/20/1983906.htm.
For more information on the Australian political parties’ stands on nuclear issues, see www.votenuclearfree.net.
Pictures of the Alice and Melbourne protests are at  http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/story/melbourne-vigil-against-nuclear-waste-dump-nt.
Creative Commons-Lizenzvertrag Dieser Inhalt ist unter einer
Creative Commons-Lizenz lizenziert.
Indymedia ist eine Veröffentlichungsplattform, auf der jede und jeder selbstverfasste Berichte publizieren kann. Eine Überprüfung der Inhalte und eine redaktionelle Bearbeitung der Beiträge finden nicht statt. Bei Anregungen und Fragen zu diesem Artikel wenden sie sich bitte direkt an die Verfasserin oder den Verfasser.
(Moderationskriterien von Indymedia Deutschland)

Ergänzungen

"Zweite Chance" des Atomkraftwerkes Borssel

Euronews 25.11.2007 - 20:41
Die zweite Chance des Atomkraftwerkes Borssele in den Niederlanden


In den vergangenen Jahren war Kernkraft out - doch nun bekommen Anlagen, die bereits im Begriff der Abschaltung waren, eine zweite Chance. Der erste Fall in Europa ist hier das Atomkraftwerk Borssele in den Niederlanden. 1973 wurde der Reaktor in Betrieb genommen. 2006 entschied sich dann die niederländische Regierung den Betrieb bis 2033 weiter fortzusetzen - 20 Jahre länger als geplant.

Borssele ist ein Energiestandort. Die niederländischen Behörden planen hier einen Mix von Energien einzusetzen. Eine Kombination von erneuerbaren Energien wie Windkraft, Kernenergie und Kohle.

Die Grünen im Europäischen Parlament halten es aber für Unsinn die Lebenszeit dieser alten Kernkraftwerke zu verlängern. Allen Reden einer Wiedergeburt der Kernenergie zum trotz stellt ein Bericht fest, dass sich diese im Niedergang befindet.